EMC China Lab

EN 18031 Testing Services

Views :
Update time : 2025-11-03

The mandatory implementation date for the EU Radio Equipment Directive (RED) cybersecurity requirements under en 18031 is August 1, 2025. Although it has not yet been officially listed as a harmonized standard in the EU Official Journal (OJ), manufacturers are advised to prepare for compliance in advance.

 

Below is a comprehensive overview of the testing content for the EN 18031 series of standards, in line with the cybersecurity requirements of the EU Radio Equipment Directive (RED):

 

EN 18031 Testing Services(图1)


Standard Background and Scope

The EN 18031 series of standards was developed by the EU to implement the cybersecurity requirements under Article 3(3)(d), (e), and (f) of the red directive (2014/53/EU), specifically focused on securing networked radio equipment. This standard is divided into three parts, each addressing asset protection in different domains:

 

- EN 18031-1: Corresponding to Article 3(3)(d), focusing on cybersecurity assets (e.g., network infrastructure, communication protocols).

 

- EN 18031-2: Corresponding to Article 3(3)(e), focusing on privacy assets (e.g., personal identification information, health data).

 

- EN 18031-3: Corresponding to Article 3(3)(f), dedicated to the protection of financial assets (e.g., devices supporting cryptocurrency transactions or funds transfer).

 

Core Testing Content

1. General Security Mechanisms (Applicable to EN 18031-1/2/3):

 - Access Control Mechanism (ACM): Verifying the device’s ability to manage user permissions, preventing unauthorized operations.

 - Authentication Mechanism (AUM): Testing the reliability and anti-breach capabilities of multi-factor authentication (e.g., biometrics, dynamic passwords).

 - Secure Communication (SCM): Checking the encryption protocols for data transmission (e.g., TLS 1.3) and the ability to defend against man-in-the-middle attacks.

 - Secure Storage Mechanism (SSM): Evaluating encryption storage solutions for sensitive data (e.g., keys, transaction records), ensuring compliance with standards such as AES-256.

 - Secure Updates Mechanism (SUM): Verifying the integrity of firmware/software updates and anti-tampering mechanisms (e.g., digital signature verification).

 

2. Itemized Testing Focus:

 - EN 18031-3 (Financial Asset Protection):

 - Anti-fraud Functions: Testing the device's ability to identify and block abnormal transactions (e.g., phishing attacks, duplicate payments).

 - Key Management: Ensuring that pre-installed or generated encryption keys are ≥112 bits in length and verifying the security of the key lifecycle (generation, storage, destruction).

 - Log Mechanism (LGM): Ensuring the integrity, anti-tampering, and traceability of transaction logs.

 

 - EN 18031-2 (Privacy Protection):

 - Data Anonymization: Verifying the anonymization processes for personal privacy information (e.g., geolocation, payment records).

 - Compliance Auditing: Checking adherence to privacy regulations such as GDPR, ensuring data minimization principles.

 

 - EN 18031-1 (Cybersecurity):

 - Vulnerability Protection: Assessing the device’s attack resistance through penetration testing (e.g., SQL injection, DDoS attack simulation).

 - Network Segmentation: Verifying the device’s network segmentation and isolation mechanisms under abnormal traffic conditions.

 

Testing Process and Requirements

1. Document Preparation:

 - Submit an asset identification table that classifies security, network, privacy, and financial assets.

 - Provide technical documentation (design specifications, communication interface matrix, security policies).

 

2. Prototype Requirements:

 - Provide 4-6 prototypes (including 2-3 debug prototypes) with open debug interfaces (e.g., root access) to support in-depth testing.

 

3. Testing Timeline:

 - Documentation Submission: 4-12 weeks.

 - Functionality Testing: 8-12 weeks (including concept evaluation, functional verification, and fuzz testing).

 

Compliance Recommendations

- Plan Ahead: Due to the lengthy testing process, it is recommended to initiate the certification process at least 6 months before the mandatory implementation deadline.

- Collaborate with Certified Laboratories: Choose a third-party laboratory qualified under the RED directive for pre-testing to optimize design flaws.

- Ongoing Maintenance: Regularly update security patches and maintain records of updates to ensure compliance throughout the device's lifecycle.


Email:hello@jjrlab.com


Leave Your Message


Write your message here and send it to us


Related News
Read More >>
Electronic Product Salt Spray Test Electronic Product Salt Spray Test
04 .25.2026
Electronic Product Salt Spray Test evaluates corrosion resistance in saline environments. Standards:...
AEC-Q100 IC / Integrated Circuit Compliance Testin AEC-Q100 IC / Integrated Circuit Compliance Testin
04 .25.2026
AEC-Q100 ensures automotive IC reliability under harsh conditions. Std: Rev-J; tests: environmental,...
AEC-Q102 Light-Emitting Device Testing AEC-Q102 Light-Emitting Device Testing
04 .25.2026
Automotive optoelectronic devices require extreme reliability; AEC-Q102 defines standards and test i...
Component Reliability Testing Component Reliability Testing
04 .25.2026
Component reliability testing ensures stability under extreme conditions, following MIL, JEDEC stand...
Cosmetics Export Compliance Testing for EU & U Cosmetics Export Compliance Testing for EU & U
04 .25.2026
Cosmetics are defined by external-use; compliance needs classification, EU RP, CPSR/PIF, CPNP, plus ...
Cosmetics Export Compliance Testing for ASEAN Cosmetics Export Compliance Testing for ASEAN
04 .25.2026
ASEAN cosmetics export requires ACD compliance, including tests for preservatives, contaminants, saf...
US GCC Certification Testing for Apparel US GCC Certification Testing for Apparel
04 .25.2026
GCC ensures apparel meets U.S. safety laws for export. JJR tests per 16 CFR 1610/1303, plus colorfas...
Textile & Apparel California Proposition 65 Te Textile & Apparel California Proposition 65 Te
04 .25.2026
California Prop 65 drives textile compliance; JJR LAB testing reduces risk effectively. Standards: P...

Leave Your Message